| The Time
Machine (2002), Run-time 96mins,
Cert PG. Director - Simon Wells. Writer - John Logan. Starring - Guy Pearce, Samantha Mumba, Mark Addy, Orlando Jones & Jeremy Irons. |
|
Why? That is the overriding question I
took away from this film. Why? Why bother? If you are going to remake a film
that was faithful to its source material and still holds up well today you’d
better improve on said film. Or dramatically alter things enough that it
stands up separately, but at the same time still works. Wells’ (Yes, he is
HG Wells Great Grandson) version of The Time Machine does neither of these
things. The film is in short a bloody mess. Screenwriter John Logan’s (whom you
may remember as the guy who tortured us with the wretched script for Star
Trek: Nemesis) take on Wells’ material starts off fairly well. The addition
of a doomed romance as the catalyst for the creation of the time machine is
a decent idea. A decent idea however, that is hampered at every turn by the
actress playing opposite Pearce. You see she has what can only be described
as acting skills akin to a plank of wood. That aside, things just get
incredibly silly as we move on. Hartdegen’s next stop is our near
future (2030ish as I recall). He takes in a talking billboard that is
advertising nuclear blasting on the moon to create colonies. Uh-oh, that
sounds ominous. But, he is still looking for answers so of he pops into a
museum where we meet a sorry excuse for a character. Orlando Jones plays Vox,
a museum hologram whose sole purpose is to rattle of reams of exposition. He
also offers a laughable piece of post-modernism as he offers Hartdegen a
copy of The Time Machine by HG Wells and then goes on to detail the 1960
film adaptation and musical. Oh, how I laughed……. I could detail the rest of the plot,
but suffice to say that Hartdegen heads back to his machine, avoids pieces
of the falling moon, falls on the accelerator and wakes up in the year
800,000 or thereabout. This is where the film completely falls apart. Like
the book and the other film this future sees humanity split into two
species, the above land living Eli and the underground dwelling Morlocks.
What follows is nothing more than a poorly staged action sequence (which is
heavily reminiscent of Burtons Apes remake, not a good thing) as Hartdegen
attempts to thwart the Morlocks and free the Eli. Guy Pearce is a fine actor, but he is
woefully misused here. He tries to show the pain at losing his fiancée, but
the script won’t let him as it transforms him into an unlikely and wholly
unconvincing action hero. Hard to believe, but Pearce is easily the best
thing acting wise in the film. Mark Addy is an actor I despise and he does
nothing here to win me over. I actually cringed during his final scene. I have been tortured enough by
Samantha Mumba’s musical ‘talents’ over the years, so lord knows I didn’t
expect much from her as an actress. Nice to see she didn’t let me down; she
is even stiffer and more wooden than the actress who plays the fiancée. It’s
also nice to see that in 800,000 years time the Irish accent will still be
prevalent! Jeremy Irons at least plays it for laughs. He looks like the
bastard offspring of Boy George and Ziggy Stardust and he camps it up
something rotten. The Morlocks themselves are a
disaster. Stan Winston is a name synonymous with quality make-up effects.
The Terminator, Alien, Predator, these are just a few of the mans sterling
credits. Why is it then that the Morlocks look like crap? They look like
guys wearing those big wooden masks that primitive tribes have. The CGI for
the action shots looks terrible too, with bad movement and bad detail. At
least you can’t see the join between practical and CGI; both are as bad as
each other. The film is beset with a ludicrous
amount of plot holes. The best one is when Pearce, Mumba and co out run an
explosion that takes out a huge chunk of jungle, yeah right. I also found
myself thinking, how do those cool looking Eli dwellings stay stuck to the
side of those cliffs? Also, how can exposition hologram guy still be
functioning 800,000 years on without electricity, regardless of the fact
that the rest of the city he’s from no longer exists? There’s more, but I
have tried to mentally block the pain…… The films only saving grace is some
pretty cool effects when the machine is moving through time, but the 1960
version had those and the rest of that film didn’t suck. Nifty effects aside
there is absolutely nothing to recommend about this film. Perhaps if you are
looking to give yourself a headache you might consider it, but otherwise
avoid at all costs.
Premise - Alexander
Hartdegen (Guy Pearce) is a university lecturer in 19th Century New York.
After his true love is murdered mere minutes after he has proposed he dives
headlong into a 4 year exile whilst he designs and builds a time machine.
His goal is to go back and stop the murder. However, when he discovers that
he cannot change the past he goes far into the future to find out why.
|
If you enjoyed The Time Machine then see – The Time Machine (1960), Planet of the Apes (2001). Poster Quote – Can I have the 96 minutes back please? |